Ecopoiesis and econoesis of Okam’s Difu
Keywords:
ecopoiesis, econoesis, cultural ecology, drama, literature, Difu, theory of imaginative literature (TIL)Abstract
Ecocriticism is a reaction to the increase in environmental consciousness. It is a kind of literary criticism that focuses on how literary writings contribute to ecology. Ecological theory is used to examine the interaction between the biological environment and the text. It looks at the aesthetics of literature and the philosophical connections between people, the environment, and texts. This article within the domain of ecocriticism aims at analysing Okam’s writing style as it interplays with the propensity of Ameshi villagers in Difu to confirm the people’s raison d’être. However, Hubert Zapf’s theory of imaginative literature is employed to interpret the nature of cultural interconnectedness and diversity in the masterpiece under the aegis of the hypothetico-deductive method and the literary cultural-ecological approach. These methodologies imply that new hypotheses are derived from spontaneous relational conversations between the characters in the drama and their environment, which serve as reservoirs of cultural-ecological knowledge. This study begins with a discussion of ecocriticism in literature, followed by a description of the theory of creative literature to expand on Hubert Zapf’s ideas and confirm results from evaluating the playwright’s ecopoiesis and characters’ econoesis in certain extracted samples of Difu. Finally, it shows the interconnectedness of nature in the play vis-à-vis Ameshi’s culture.
References
Alencar, A. S., do Nascimento, L. B. T., de Lima Garcia, M., de Sá, T. M. D. A., Rolim, W. C., & Nobre, C. B. (2020). The impact of fires in amazon rainforest on public health. Amadeus International Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(8), 1-6.
Coulton, P., & Lindley, J. G. (2019). More-than human centred design: Considering other things. The Design Journal, 22(4), 463-481.
Crucifix, M., Loutre, M. F., & Berger, A. (2005). Commentary on “the anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago”. Climatic Change, 69(2), 13-426.
Goldsmith, M., & Reiter, M. (2015). Triggers: Creating behavior that lasts--becoming the person you want to be. New York: Crown Business.
Grewe-Volpp, C. (2006). Nature “out there” and as “a social player”: some basic consequences for a literary ecocritical analysis. In Nature in Literary and Cultural Studies (pp. 71-86). Brill.
Hanna, E., & Hall, R. J. (2020). Earth, air, fire and ice: exploring links between human-induced global warming, polar ice melt and local scale extreme weather. In Science, Faith and the Climate Crisis (pp. 47-64). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Iheka, C. (2018). Naturalizing Africa. Cambridge University Press.
Jameson, F. (1985). Postmodernism and consumer society. Postmodern culture, 115(11), 111-125.
Johns‐Putra, A. (2016). Climate change in literature and literary studies: From cli‐fi, climate Change Theater and ecopoetry to ecocriticism and climate change criticism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(2), 266-282.
Kurzweil, E. (2017). The Age of Structuralism: From Lévi-Strauss to Foccault. Routledge.
Landis, A. G. (1997). “Ecopoiesis.” Science Fiction Age. https://archive.org/stream/Science_Fiction_Age_v05n04_1997-05/Science_Fiction_Age_v05n04_1997-05_djvu.txt
Lewis, H. S. (2007). The influence of Edward Said and Orientalism on anthropology, or: can the anthropologist speak?. Israel Affairs, 13(4), 774-785.
May, B. (1997). The Modernist as Pragmatist: EM Forster and the fate of Liberalism. University of Missouri Press.
Mondrzak, V., Duarte, A. L., Lewkowicz, A., Kauffmann, A. L., Iankilevich, E., Brodacz, C., ... & Pellanda, L. E. (2018). The unconscious in the perspective of complexity and of chaos: an initial approach. In The unconscious (pp. 167-182). Routledge.
Murphy, P. D. (2013). Transversal Ecocritical Praxis: Theoretical Arguments, Literary Analysis, and Cultural Critique. Lexington Books.
Okam, C. L. (2020). Matricentric Feminism and Mythology in Umaru Landan and Dexter Lyndersay’s Shaihu Umar.” International Journal of Current Research in the Humanities 24: 349-365.
Okam, L. C. (2021). Difu. Jos: Dynastygold Impact Publishers.
Onyemelukwe, I. M. (2004). Colonial, feminist and postcolonial discourses: decolonisation and globalisation of African literature. Labelle Educational Publishers.
Shokrollahi, N. (2016). Philosophy and Dream. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio, 10(2): 84-91.
Sutton, M. Q., & Anderson, E. N. (2014). Introduction to Cultural Ecology, 3rd ed. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Umaru, L., & Lyndersay, D. (1975). Shaihu Umar. London: Longman.
Zapf, H. (Ed.). (2016a). Handbook of ecocriticism and cultural ecology (Vol. 2). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Zapf, H. (2016b). Literature as cultural ecology: Sustainable texts. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Yohanna Joseph WALIYA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.